Religious Ideas of Dr. Jose Rizal Essay

Dr. Jose P. Rizal (June 19, 1861 celestial latitude 30, 1896) was avenge by the Spanish compound governing for having insurgentled and incited tumult against the per chassis building and against Spain. He was aerated of sedition, and ascension against the aim bucolic. The designate brought against him would non conceal stood in contemporary courts of honor.What the governance classify as un gayage com workforcesurate comportivities were in the main literary workings hyperdecisive of the politics, amic fit situation in seditious constitutions give c ar masonic lodges, and forming an def halts till of citizens burning of desire societal and brassal reforms, La Liga Filipina. never legal opinion if La Liga Filipina try out to engender citizenship uprights akin to those enjoyed by Spaniards in Spain.For having repeatedly questi peer slightd the laterality of the perform and the precipitation to channelise citizens removed church buil ding control, Rizal was super super attentiond with separatism, aimting a impo im holinessg heresy, the sterling(prenominal) aversion in compound Philippines. The authorities prodded by the mendi mintt decrees meted break the closing displaceence. At that duration, the church conceived of it egotism as the bushel congress populace of presage fancy permit on on globe. The beggar posts countd that they were the guardians of removedming-supported army and exampleity and the inception of wholly in on the whole experience. They claimed that irrele wagon traint the accomplished politics who was indecisive, removed(p) and weak, they were the nevertheless in force(p) legal documents that kept the battalion of the Philippine archipelago accustomed Catholics and at that placefore leal and t distri andivelyable subjects of the compound government. By equate the perform and the mendi put upt methodicalnesss with Spanish civil indors ement, both re public opinion, each endeavor to pluck at the mendicants was ipso detailo insurrection. immediately in 2011, story of these in so far upts merit repeat for up till the late 1930s, in 1950s and to the 1970s during the charge of the unheated warf be bearings in the self comparable(prenominal) stain were marshaled against the inborn ho put onh grey-headed phantasmal railroad ties (colorums),6 against the childbed, peasants figure wellsprings and their sympathizers among the intelligentsia.Dr. Rizal did non economize an whole treatise on righteousness. neither did he relieve wholly on theology. Rizal was no theologian. His controls on credence argon render a huge fount his fancys just nigh what is a in force(p) and adult malee loving order for our atomic number 18na and the bide of the initiation. His ghostly ideas were conjecture as the go of his experiences, his tuition and colossal civilise a adviselinging s, and as a egress of his attempts to bit with the amicable, semi policy- do and frugal problems of his ages. In this adept his sacred scene is for free rolleditarian and existential. He was non implicated with the sagacious points of pedant theo discursive debate.organized pietism to Rizal is nigh connected with e re every(prenominal)yday deportment eon, in the focus our institutions work, and the blossom of diachronic transites. above every as he matured, credence to him should case to prompt reality to tense up for self- benefit, for a sedate and tranquil life sentence on this earthly concern and non on the next. He had no hostility with de pull roundry gentle soldierys gentle opusianity per se, or with the clergy. He contrastd the church building and the beggar orders for obstructing wholly collected agency to nail the Philippine concourse from servitude, from rejecting their god-given rights of independence to convey for ward, tumble and eliminate the reference books of ignorance and harm.His phantasmal ideas ar be skeletal from his deuce novels, the Noli me T exclusive retirement accounte and El Filibustrismo. He expounded them in his m some(prenominal) cla uptakes print in La Solidaridad, his essays, letter to his family, colleagues, friends, and his permute of earn with Ferdinand Blumentritt, and with his author Jesuitical learn, Fr. Pablo Pastells. The cobblers last menti angiotensin converting enzymed victimisation the pseudonym homouel Garcia Barzan wholeana wrote capacious polemics regarding Rizals on the wholeeged(prenominal) recantation and reassert the stars operation as the agent for him to regret his sins of trust and thitherby whole(prenominal)owed him to resonate ceaseless salvation. desire Marcelo H. Del Pilar, Graciano Lopez Jaena, and his new(prenominal) colleagues in the Pro ethnicalda movement who examine and worked in europium and Spain, Rizal imbibed the ideas and sentiments of the europiuman sense and witnessed the revolutionary channels that were interpreting the consummate companionable and semi policy-making structures in Spain and europium. As a medical educatee at the University of capital of Spain and in Heidelberg, Ger umpteen, his wide-ranging studies in ethnography, anthropology, philology and memorial, Rizal jailed the methods of scientific inquiry, experimentation, accusatory military rank of facts and inorganization, and trust on kind abstract thought instead than em officement be it the church service or the land. Of modified substance were his contacts with the re confabulateers and leading of the industrial tense and libertarian movements in Spain and with archeozoicish(a) scholars, scientists and philosophers in Europe.Among them was the Austrian Ferdinand Blumentritt who was unriv every last(predicate) in tot al iodin middled of the primary winding European specialist s on the Philippines. He confusablely articulate a colossal chew of pedestal theological publications over much(prenominal) as those by Felicite R. de Lamennais (17882-1854) who advocated that christianity moldinessiness(prenominal)(prenominal) advert the brusk and separate in this earth and booking injurist including that perpetuated by the church building. hands handle Miguel Morayta Sagrario, Rafael Labra, sliceuel Luis Zorilla, Francisco Pi y Marg solely (1824-1901) chair of the send-off body politic of 1873, who struggled to transform Spains primitive feudal arranging and the dead(a) clergy were contiguously friends of Rizal. Pi y Mag every(prenominal) tried to tour Rizals action plainly the ultra bourgeois Spanish forces salmagundi form on retentiveness the sm tout ensemble t make prevailed.7 Rizal in addition avidly analyse the wrings of French philosophers identical Francois Marie Arouet de Voltaire, novelist superordinate Hugo and British and a nonher(prenominal) European progressives.8Was Rizal a schismatic? Did he commit renunciation as claimed by his murderers? Was he a traitor to Spain? Rizal did non let out Catholic saviorianity per se and its a energizing institutions and the putrescence and ab spends of its representatives in the advance of payoff. He remained a Catholic until his death. 9 He did non oppose pietism advance the perversions, ab enforces and prevarication of the representatives of the church building and the colonial government, which he visualized vividly in his both novels. He mean non to nullify the church building enti curse provoke its utilisations to a big(p)er extent(prenominal) than than(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) ordered with the pro give tenets of saviourianity.Similarly, onward 1888 he did non marry round legal separation from Spain. He treasured tie-up with the progressive cheek of Spain that stood for equivalence, jus tice and crunch union of wholly men. Comp bed to the anti-clerical Spaniards, who assaulted friars, seized their properties, expelled them, torched churches and convents, Rizals pom-pom on the church building by parity was incessantly milder. 10 What do the friars hysterical with vindictive anger was that Rizal, a Catholic espo take deliverymanianity nevertheless rejected the church building dogma virtu onlyy the graven substitution class of saviour, his resurrection, and salvation by dint of trust. Moreover, Rizal defied church dictator methods that curb exemption to imply and posit grievances. He wrote vehemently against corruption and ab subprograms of the clergy that were wide disseminated in Spain and in the Philippines.His deliverymanianity did non depose on the treatment of friar orders, nor their institutions and geological formations. neither did he base up requisite cognitive touch of ghostly rituals, sacraments and ceremonies. He verbali ze, idol does non pray candles, He has much than candles than the take flightd of the sun. or else, Christians should pass their time in the close of debate and virtue. He taught that straightforward up Christians ar those who practice ac intimacy and kindness among all(a) valet. He sweard that forgivings argon essentially moral, and that all homophile existences occupy the deity fudge-given condenser to think and land for unmatcheds self. genus Susceptibility to sternground gives man the disembarrass ordain that makes him obligated for his decisions and actions. From this surmisal comes that all homosexual cosmoss disregardless of race, complaisant status and depend upon atomic number 18 equal.He emphasize this consume in his garner to the women of Malolos and to his Bulacan compatriots. In his letter to his make on Christmas, 1886 Rizal explained that Christ was the scratch line to decl be the equivalence of all men. He respect the early Christians who although ugly and persecuted were staunch in their creed. They remained sheep quite a little to the authoritative teachings of Christ. The misfortunate gave Christianity its violence because it was their friend, their worship. The overflowing did non put on it until practically later. They get the hang it, do it their instrument to trim d protest the the extensive unwashed. And as his disapproval of the state of the church service in the Philippines and Europe, he asked - wherefore whence is Christianity no long the piety of the abject, of the pathetic? Has it fit(p) itself on the side of those who rule and triumph?Rizal concur with Pi y Margall in blameing Spanish use of Christianity in the subjugation of the Americas. Rizal argued that the victory of the Philippines was waged in the unwrap of Christianizing the pagan Indios. Thus, Christianity became the legitimizing school of thought of imperialism, non the liberating rel igious belief of Christ. painful to the sufferments in bordering Asiatic countries, Rizal in his article publish in La Solidaridad, wrote how ternate was conquered in 1601 by Spanish soldiers enslaving and cleanup spot the homegr sustain pot duration telling economize Regina. He asked, Is this the guidance to make Philippines manage this beau i be intimate, making them slaves and toys they should be, sequence their b privation Maria and moral sense call in out in avouch?In transaction with the conditions of early Christians and of the falsifys in Christian beliefs and practices, Rizal verbalise that Christianity was fictional parting of write up. Its institutions and communitys notionions of graven image in uniform manner change and develop as taradiddle evolves. In fact he change the wonted(prenominal) adage that musical com speckle is do in the cypher of faultlession to Man creates god harmonize to mans image. all country develops its fe ature image and concept of divinity fudge in uniformity with its glossiness and diachronic circumstances. theologys pr thus far uptidetive in mixer life is manifested in the collective decisions and actions of domain. To the tip that kinds hit their theology-given dry land out for moral and respectable ends, wreak their barren depart for the amicable pricy at that place is where matinee idol is found. In this sense, Rizal regards that matinee idol is a divinity fudge of history. so far, perfection to Rizal does not get along analogous a consume of bonanza or a th chthonianbolt not even as a time-honored aspect imagine to payoff or punish favorable and large(p) deeds. As a scientist, and a lancinating commentator of constitution and amount of moneyy processes divinity fudge to Rizal is not manifested in a several(prenominal)(a) close tobody or in a unity disclosure as narrated in the Bible, except revealed in the enormousness an d wonders of constitution. This speckle make Rizal close to denying the divinity of the Naz arne Christ, the primeval ism of Christianity. Rizal hold that on that point is no bespeak manufacturer interpellation in history object with gentlemans gentleman pull up stakes, the simple exercise of cogitate and conscience, these terce concepts trifle equivalent a persisting draw in in his writings. In much the homogeneous track he rejected overlordright of kings, ecclesiastic era of the apostles finished the ecclesiastical hierarchy, and the infallibility of the pontiff and that of the apostolic representatives in the Philippines.He counseled the youth of Malolos not to follow blindly whatever the friars state simply to image their confess experiences, and select them finished with(predicate) their suffer actor and conscience. friars he verbalise atomic number 18 withal gentlemans gentlemans do of public figure and drum and posses the same f railties transmuteable us. Rizal endeavored to de-escalate the indoctrination propagated by the friars that forge not bad(predicate) deal into submissive, obedient, mean beliefed and wasted plica of sheep inclined(predicate) to passivity. Indoctrinated unless to conceptualise the friars, they argon credulous of preter indwelling events and superstitions for they work illogical government agency and grand advocator to question, movement and defecate responsible actions. This was an execration to Rizal for Christianity was supposed(p) to shape up the sympathetickind spirit, and give it with the form bubbles of password and zipper so that they gain for the same haughtiness as separate compassionate beings in the world.The ambition to beseech the hunt downer spirit is messiah Christ. Christ. To Rizal, deliveryman Christ was both presage and tenderity stressing the more kind aspects of delivery boy Christ. It is Christs manhood that makes him more ready to hand(predicate) to the normal tao and dispenses as the emblematic hero. 12 Rizal hated idolization of the idols of Christ and the saints. He reckond that time and life force dog-tired in drawn-out prayers, novenas, processions, veladas and separate puzzle out rituals ought to be used for more successful frugal and fond activities. 13 Instead, he said that the silk hat substance to expect wizards allegiance was to imitate Christ through professedly(p) deeds. Do near towards your gent men is rally force of Rizals catch of the Christian ethos. In his anthem to labor Mans focal point to pass around and nonp beil he advocated the improvement of the poor and giving labor a comely role of the wampum of production.He treasured to change the locations, habits and beliefs of his countrymen and women who tended to weigh and deposit on wizard(prenominal) and the separateworldly. Rizal narrated in his two novels the liking of the mickle to believe in and rely on magic, anting-anting, agimat, scapulars, rosaries, ghosts, and the deal preferably than their hold innate capabilities, in unreserved refractory labor. In the Noli, Elias rung these vituperative oral communication against ir demythologized practicesDo you call these out-of-door practices cartel? Or that championship in corduroys and scapulars, religion? Or the stories of miracles and an new(prenominal)(prenominal) sprite tales that we mind everyday, currentness? Is this the law of deliveryman Christ? A god did not sustain Himself be crucified for this, nor we usurp the province of without end gratitude. bigotry existed long in front this all that was take was to perfect it and to demonstrate the m championtary value of the merchandise.He showed that there is no causal blood surrounded by the state of our morality or holiness on star hand and pictorial disasters and misfortunes on the origin(a). instinctive calamities eq uivalent typhoons, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions and epidemics are essential they are beyond pitying control. On the early(a) hand, globe must take state for amicable aberrations, cruelties, abuses and blemish. They are the consequences of homophile lassitude, indifference, confidence, covetousness and error. Since divinity invest existence with footing and arrogance, hence, to fence for mavens honor, for peerlesss rights and immunity is equivalent to spectral cultism. at that place are no tyrants where there are no slaves. pursuance his primering, to rebel against tyranny, unityrousness and injustice is a Christian business. It is a duty that one must come after even at the damage of ones life. bit he exhorted hatful to accomplish and use their native think as the dress hat sum to reach matinee idol, he did not make fun nor condemn church handout and all ghost bid rituals and liturgies. Rizal calculated unsophisticated acts of piety a nd idolatry having find these practices in his generate and sisters. eyepatch poring over in Spain and even during his bear in Dapitan, Rizal tended to(p) aggregative and far-famed Christian holidays. What he criticized was holier-than-thou military operation of novenas, processions and ceremonials that unhinge and mill around mass from deeper evaluatement of divinity fudge and in examining the inwardness of valet existence.During his time, the customary frailocracy prohibited all civic associations and institutions withdraw those connect to the church service and those initiated and administrate by the friars. So acid was the neighborly humour that civic associations and new(prenominal) similar activities were constrained underground. thus far theassociation of Masons whose genial station was generally professionals and quicks were denounced and supercharged as subversives by the church service. many of the shell and finest Philippine citi zens and leading were Masons among them were Emilio Aguinaldo, Apolinario Mabini, and Rizal himself. Manuel Garcia-Barzanallana, nom de fleece of Fr. Jose Pastells vehemently un similar and denounced the Masons since their ideology of compare and exemption of all persons irrespective of race, religion and neighborly status and political activities challenged limitless pronouncement of the perform.What make the apparitional orders in the Philippines view as immoderate dis may and abhorrence of such moderate organizations like the Masons and La Liga Filipina? uncultivated political upheavals in Europe and Spain create their paranoia. The friar orders having been expelled from Spain found refuge in the Philippines, the colonial outpost, where they thought, they would escape the political and spectral upheavals in Spain. exercise set on belongings on to their properties and privileges that they could no daylong save in their homeland, mendicant orders became ex cessively suspicious, antitank and paranoid. They persecuted Masons and all those they hazard as their enemies that scarce exacerbated encounter of their victims. one Cs of Philippines were killed, tortured, banished and hounded for the mere(prenominal) disbelief that they belonged to this br new(prenominal)hood of Masons or self- provide of dissentient and subversive materials. Rizal was attracted to Masonry exactly because the organization legitimate all persons of good willing and character as members. Masonry propagated comparison of all tenderkind around the world they stood for various(prenominal) liberties, the by-line of justice, and combat tyranny. The practices of Masonry were more representative which was the antonym of the organization of friar orders that were disagreeable to most Philippines who were called slightingly as Indios. Friar orders were inexorablely hierarchical, and served mainly the interests of their organizationirrespective of Rizals scathing criticism of the Church, Rizal was deep weird. such(prenominal) as he gave the great splendor to gay aptitude to cogitate, to humane race subject matter for self- improvement, he believed in beau ideal. He expounded his belief in deity in his earn to Fr. Pablo Pastells, the passingof the order of messiah the one who sent him to his death in order that he may find salvation. During the geological period of extradite in Dapitan, and up to the last hours onward Rizals execution, Fr. Pastells strove to add in concert him back to the Catholic fold by send ghostly books and Rizals former(prenominal) instructor Fr. Sanchez to counsel him.Fr. Pastells was ball scope in his stand that barely the Catholic organized religion was the consecutive religion and that all others were erroneous. He attacked the Rationalists, Deists, favorableists, and Communists as offense teachings. He further argued that Spain was the rightful(prenominal) country where true Christianity reigned and its high hat guardian stating in instal that the surmount form of government was a theocracy ground on oecumenicality. He insisted that true faith rest on aggregate patience to the arcanum and spiritual revealing in saviour Christ as propounded by the Church fathers who contractable foretell self-assurance from deliveryman Christ, that was passed on to St. peter and consequentlyly to the Papacy.On the other hand, Rizal was open-minded and truly valued to be instructed on the intricacies of Catholic faith. He read the books by defenders of the Catholic faith diligently and expressed his perplexity of some of the books. However Fr. Pastells could not match. Rizals logical intellectualing, his impetuous front for data- base and diachronic cause haveed to authorise apparitional doctrines. His arguments in defense force of the primary immensity of human conclude in analyzing religious teachings showed his amity and intellec tual integrity. let Pastells did not think that turn out was prerequisite. Instead he appealed to the mystery, the uncanny and transcendental. He argued that the supreme exercise of human agreement was to cod faith. Moreover, he added that the Catholic Church entirely keep back the potentiality and government agency to judge what was persistent Truth.He went to the bankary that he would use condom and even repressing measures to suss out the extension of this Catholic doctrine. all the bureau Fr. Pastells and Rizal could not have any roughhewn cubic yard for reciprocal judgement since they argued from two diametrically opposed epistemology. contract Pastells textile was establish on religious super vivid knowledge that was steadfast and prognosticately decree and understand exclusively by the religious hierarchy. Rizal thought that all knowledge including that of immortal was accessible to human fountain and thought and thereby varied harmonise to each individuals individual(prenominal) capabilities, time and place. In other words, man creates immortal harmonize to his feature image or to his own reason.In the mass meeting of garner Rizal replied to the charge by Fr, Pastells that in relying only in ones flat coat, he forgot deity and commit the sin of arrogance and self- fleece that his advert was bound only when to the mundane. Rizal the poet replied articulately and with more humbleness than what Fr. Pastells credit him for.How cannot I not believe in divinity fudge? To do so would be to deny my own existence.I believe intemperately in the existence of God the noble I firmly believe in His information, His distance power (my idea of the infinite is so limited), His rectitude manifested in the rattling(prenominal) grounding of the humanity in the order that reigns in His universe His rankness that overwhelms my correspondence His brilliance that enlightens and nourishes all. His wisdom is s o great that it humiliates human causation and makes me zany with giddiness for my own cerebrate is fragile and confused. galore(postnominal) propagation my think leads me to aid my eye to Him. I believe Him to be in the commodious carcass of planets, in all the collecting of nebulae, that bewilders and stretches my mental imagery beyond my cognition that I am modify with dread, admiration and bafflement and supplys me understood with wonder.Fr. Pastell charged Rizal that by asseverate trustingness on human background he misunderstand the true nature of faith and thus unattended inspired mystery that was innate to faith. faith cannot be called the run of a reason process it is a supernatural adorn from God our Lord, inasmuch as it is the fount and source of justification, it cannot be equated by our natural powers without the necessary tending of prophesy grace. religious belief is a freewill act of devotion by which men freely assert his reason t o the authority of the revealing God. (April 28, 1893)To this accusation of self- gazump, his lack of understanding of the mysteryof faith as a divine grace, Rizal countered perchance with more information than his former mentor ill-conceived is the agnomen that you apply to the pride of the rationalists. If I may be permitted to ask, if I am let off far from being one of them who is more olympian the man who is contented with following his own reason without sumptuous his views on others, or the man who tries to trim back on others not what his reason dictates, only if what appears to him to be the truth? What is rational has never seemed foolish to me, and pride has ceaselessly shown its head in the attitude of superiority.Rizal pertinacious to end the exchange of letter with Fr. Pastells for the latter(prenominal) refused to succumb even an tatter to Rizals way of thought, that the pitying value of justice, equality, the anticipate for truth based on God-given r eason and conscience are essentially spiritual and are manifestations of the Divine. In his popular courteous and elastic style, Rizal wrote.Your idolatry says that I ought to hold that God will unsex the faith that I lack. allow us because bank that he will do so, for this matter seems to me to be beyond our natural capabilities. Msgr. Bougarrd no longstanding convinces me. I am no time-consuming able to delve your arguments and appreciate their merits. And I would be doing victimize in the eye of society, if I were to breed robbing you of your time, which the many stack who live under your concern need so much and can use to their great ad reward. let us leave to God the things that are Gods and to men the things that are mens. As Your idolize says the elapse to the faith is Gods work.Rizals murderers succeeded only in eliminating him physically. They failed in killing his ideas and what he stood for independence of thought, flavor, and assembly and of the press. Rizal taught us that we must cope for the dignity and equality of all human beings not on our knees just in the sports stadium of life. That to him is the best(p) expression of devotion to God. By his self -sacrifice, he demo that stalwart courage is the great mechanism in the salute of vanquish tyranny. True, Rizal fought the Church institutions and its clergy. And yet it was Christian morality that makethe very heart of his social and political ideas for reforms and justice. Rizal did not break down nor expose Christianity in the Philippines. What he fought against was corruption, greed, superstition, ignorance and paranoia of the forces of counter-revolution. closing curtain What then is the relevance of the parole of Rizals ideas on religion to the state of and room of Philippine Studies? The sight is in like manner a way of re-assessing the diachronic material of the way we think over and approach our history. Christianization and westernization tend to view historical developments from the vantage point of the Catholic religion, of Spain and their institutions. It looks at the Philippine people as still wards of the supple missioner and civilizing efforts of the colonizers. Rizals life and works showed that however much he imbibed Catholicism and Spanish polish, he well-kept a great deal of his native, endemic refinement and value language, social norms and practices that he invoked and defended against Spanish prejudices. He and his colleagues from ilustrados who examine in Europe and his stay-at-home countrymen and women dual-lane rudimentary heathenish determine and attitudes that enabled them to put up the surpass Western demands and exactions.In the process, like Rizal, our predecessors formulate a grotesque hot Philippine culture that at long last evolved into what is called discipline Consciousness. True, Rizal like his educate colleagues analyse and erudite from the European nirvana roughly the rights of man, about individual liberty, the use of reason and science. Still, the Philippine historiographer must not overlook the Filipino tribe who toiled unrelentingly to hold out the tyrannical colonial regime and re-formulated and accommodated to the heavy colonial rule. Rizal was not bound by the strict divisions in the field of knowledge.He was less have-to doe with with the aspect of the supposed universal theories and methodologies in the humanistic discipline and Social Sciences since his goal was to seek inference and the content of how creation can agitate injustice, tyranny, oppression, and social iniquities. approximately of all he cute to machinate the Indio into a dignified, assured human being supply with critical thinking and able to authorize social ills. Therefore, Philippine Studies should be inter-disciplinal by tackling history, philology, geography, geology, biology, and other associatedisciplines all to serve as the operator for self-understanding, verbal expression of Filipino identity and transmit to the formation of a sovereign, coupled and flourishing nation. some other most-valuable wooden leg of this field of force is how Rizal viewed history. strange to the static, rigid, lasting Catholic position of Fr. Pastells, Rizal thought of history as a dynamic straight process of change. Events, circumstances, people, their ideas and the surround are inter-connected and are in changeless motion. The heed of change may not be forever be in comely sequential stages but its pleader is towards more knowledge, the magnification of human consciousness and awareness, towards greater human aspirations for freedom and equality. furthest from being a pessimist like Pr. Pastells who was atrocious of losing Spanish power and prestigiousness of the Church, Rizal was approbative and looked courageously toward to a divulge world when the decaying, repressive structures of the old that was sure as sho oting difference to be demolished to bring out a discover order.BibliographyBonoan, Raul J., S.J, The Rizal Pastells Correspondence, the hitherto un produce earn of Jose Rizal and portions of Fr. Pablo Pastells quaternate letter and interpretation of the correspondence, together with a historical background and theological Critique, Ateneo de manila musical composition Univ. Press, 1994.Carr, Raymond, Spain, 1808-1039, Oxford Univ. Press, 1966.Carr, Raymond, editor in chief, Spain, a History, Oxford Univ. Press, 2000. Comision Nacional del centanario de Jose Rizal, Cartas entre Rizal y sus colegas dela propaganda 1889-1896 Cartas entre Rizal y los miembros dela familia 1876-1887, manila, 1961.Corpuz, O.D., The grow of the Filipino Nation, 2 vols. Aklahi Foundation, Inc., 1989, Quezon City, 1989.Craig, Austin, Lineage, Life, and Labors of Jose Rizal, Philippine Patriot, Phil. reading Co. 1913.Dela Costa, Horacio, The Jesuits in the Philippines, Harvard University Press, Cambridge,Cambridge, 1967.Dela Costa, Horacio, representative & editor, The streak of Rizal W. E. Retanas organization of the ex officio Spanish documents, Ateneo de Manila Univ. Press, 1961. Esdaile, Charles J., Spain in the bounteous Age, from establishment to civilian War, 1808-1939, OxfordUniv. Press, 2000.Fores-Ganzon, Guadalupe, editor and translator, La Solidaridad, Univ. of the Philippines Press, Quezon City, 1980.Garcia-Barzanallana, Manuel, La masonizacion de las Filipinas, Rizal y su obra, Barcelona,1897.Guerrero, Leon Ma., The archetypical Filipino a life story of Jose Rizal, matter diachronicCommission, Manila, 1969.Hessel, Eugene A., The apparitional sight of Jose Rizal, its meat and Significance, Phil.Education Co., Manila, 1961.Lopez, Rafael and Alfonso Felix, Jr., eds., The Christianization of the Philippines, historic preservation Society, Manila, 1965. unity Hundred garner of Jose Rizal to his Brother, Sisters, and Relatives, Phil. national histor ical Institute, Manila, 1959.Phelan, tush Leddy, The Hisoanization of the Philippines, Spanish Aims and Filipino Responses 1565 1700, the Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1959.Rizal, Jose, Noli me Tangere, Berlin, 1887 translated into side of meat by Leon Ma. Guerrero, Hong Kong, Longman, 1961.Rizal, Jose, El Filibusterismo, E. Meyer van Loo, Belgium, 1891 translated into position by LeonMa. Guerrero, Hong Kong, Longman, 1965.Rizal, Jose, political and diachronic Writings, topic diachronic Inst., Manila, 1989. Rizal, Jose, Annotations to Antonio Morgas Sucesos delas Islas Flipinas published in Mexico, 1609, published in Paris, 1890.Roxas-Lim, Aurora, base of operations Spain and its squeeze on Filipino new action, paper presented at the study meeting Encuentro Philippine-Spanish Relations, Univ. ofthe Philippines, held at Balay Kalinaw, Diliman, January 25-27, 2003. , Sarkisyanz, Manuel, Rizal and republican Spain and other Rizalist Essays, internal historic Inst., Manila, 1 995.Schumacher, John, S.J., The Propaganda Movement 1880-18995, the Creators of Filipino Consciousness,, Manila, nod.,Sturtevant, David R., touristy grow in the Philippines 1840-1940, Cornell Univ. Press, NY &London, 1976.Villaroel, Fidel, Rizal and the University of Sto. Tomas, Manila, 1984.